ºÚÁϳԹÏÍø

Employers strike deal with UCU leaders in USS pension talks

Agreement raises hopes that strike action could be suspended later this week

March 12, 2018
Strike placards

Employers and union leaders have struck a deal on reforming UK university pensions, raising hopes that strike action, which is into its fourth week, could soon be suspended.

Universities UK and the University and College Union said that the would see defined benefits ¨C the element of the Universities Superannuation Scheme which guarantees members a set level of income in retirement ¨C protected under transitional arrangements set to take effect in April 2019 and expected to last for three years.

Contributions from universities and staff would increase during the transition period, to 19.3 per cent for employers and 8.7 per cent for employees (currently 18 per cent and 8 per cent respectively).

Given concerns expressed by many universities and UCU about the scheme¡¯s valuation methodology, which triggered reports of a ?6.1 billion deficit and UUK¡¯s proposal to end defined benefits, an independent expert valuation group would be convened to look into the issue.

ºÚÁϳԹÏÍø

ADVERTISEMENT

And both sides would commit to ¡°engage in meaningful discussions as soon as possible to explore risk sharing alternatives¡±, in particular ¡°collective defined contributions¡±, with a view to putting the USS on a stable footing from 2022 onwards.

UCU said that the deal would be considered by its higher education committee and branch representatives on 13 March and, if they back the deal, strike action currently under way at 65 universities would be suspended as of 14 March.

ºÚÁϳԹÏÍø

ADVERTISEMENT

UUK said that it would consult with its members ahead of a meeting of the USS joint negotiating committee on 14 March.

However, many union branches were quick to signal their dissatisfaction with the deal, using the hashtag #NoCapitulation on Twitter.

The University of Liverpool branch issued a which said that members ¡°in our branch and across the country did not join one of the most impressive shows of collective solidarity in the face of restrictive trade union laws for a compromise offer that does not guarantee them decency in retirement¡±.

¡°Liverpool UCU call on all branches to reject this unacceptable offer and demand that UCU ensure a deal is brought about that is commensurate to the sacrifice of their members,¡± the branch said.

ºÚÁϳԹÏÍø

ADVERTISEMENT

USS members are currently down to be on strike for all of this week over UUK¡¯s original proposals for pension reforms, which UCU says would leave the typical lecturer ?10,000 worse off every year in retirement.

The joint statement issued by UUK and UCU says that UCU would ¡°encourage its members to prioritise the rescheduling of teaching in order to minimise the disruption to students¡± from the strike.

UUK, meanwhile, says it would ask institutions ¡°to consider ways in which the financial impact [of the strike] on graduate teaching assistants may be minimised¡±, although there is no agreement on restoring pay lost by more senior staff.

Under the transitional arrangements, defined benefits would accrue on salaries of up to ?42,000, rather than ?55,000, as is currently the case.

ºÚÁϳԹÏÍø

ADVERTISEMENT

UUK and UCU say that ¡°trust needs to be rebuilt following this dispute¡±, adding that the agreement ¡°demonstrates a commitment by both parties to work together and avoid damaging disputes in the future¡±.

chris.havergal@timeshighereducation.com

Register to continue

Why register?

  • Registration is free and only takes a moment
  • Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
  • Sign up for our newsletter
Register
Please Login or Register to read this article.

Related articles

Reader's comments (4)

Not if the feeling on Twitter is to be believed #NoCapitulation
Yes there is only one answer to this CUT the bureaucracy in UK Universites so much money is being wated on government bureaucracy (REF, TEF, KEF), it is unbelievable admin costs up 7% last year alone ! STOP the BUREAUCRACY it is robbing the pensions, robbing the academic staff of pay rises.
How broad is the support to crowd fund legal action against the USS trustees? Is this reaching many universities? There is the point of view that the USS have no acted in the interest of their members.
Am a bystander, ex uni person with deferred USS Pension. Am totally onside with the strike because it is a fundamentally important issue affecting the future of the higher education system itself. Am not going to bother going into all the whys and wherefores because in this forum most people will agree. However , I have a genuine question : I would like to be able to donate to support all those good uni folk esp the precariat giving up income. But I still have a visceral distrust of UCU, i.e if I could be guaranteed that money I gave would be used to support striking folk in need right now I would do it. But I am totally reluctant to donate to a generic UCU ' fighting fund' used for general UCU purposes and given the ( imo) pathetic, brainless and supine performance of the UCU leadership in the "negotiations" - they don't even seem to understand the power they have just unleashed - can't possibly give money to UCU. SO how can I support the staff who are giving up so much themselves?? Is there any other way to donate from a distance???

Sponsored

ADVERTISEMENT