ºÚÁϳԹÏÍø

Edinburgh ¡®intimidating¡¯ pro-Palestinian scholars, letter claims

University accuses protesters of creating hostile environment on campus

December 7, 2024
Edinburgh, UK - May 9, 2011 University of Edinburgh in Scotland in the UK. Late in evening
Source: iStock

More than 550 staff and students have accused the University of Edinburgh of intimidation and suppressing pro-Palestinian voices.

?cancelling room bookings for pro-Palestinian events, removing posters in staff offices, binning memorials, and threatening disciplinary action.

¡°We cannot tolerate the contradiction of an institution that claims to uphold freedom of expression, but actively works to shut down certain views and threaten those who continue to insist on speaking,¡± says the letter. ¡°There cannot be a Palestine exception to freedom of expression.¡±

The signatories ¨C which numbered 558 at the time of writing ¨C say that senior managers have ¡°adopted increasingly intimidatory behaviour¡± towards student groups that are supporting Palestine.

ºÚÁϳԹÏÍø

ADVERTISEMENT

Students at Edinburgh?have been calling for the university to divest from companies associated with the Israeli military, even starting a hunger strike earlier this year.

The letter records eight incidents of Palestinian solidarity posters being removed, four memorials to killed family members in Gaza being taken down or binned by security staff, rooms being cancelled at short notice, and two student groups being threatened with disciplinary action.

ºÚÁϳԹÏÍø

ADVERTISEMENT

It also cites three instances of intimidation directed at staff and PhD students, one of which escalated into ¡°racial abuse and harassment¡± from one staff member to another.

One staff member, who did not wish to be named, told?Times ºÚÁϳԹÏÍø?that the violations of freedom of speech were a ¡°nervous reaction¡± from management to the broad consensus in support of Palestine.

¡°The violations reported in the letter are part of a trend of transformation of support for ceasefire and anti-genocide mobilisation on campus into a threat, into something that makes our community ¡®unsafe¡¯,¡± they said.

¡°The danger is to create a Palestine exception to free speech, discriminating on the basis of political beliefs.¡±

ºÚÁϳԹÏÍø

ADVERTISEMENT

The letter calls on Edinburgh leaders to cease all intimidation of students mobilising and raising awareness on campus in solidarity with Palestine. Management must also acknowledge the role of the institution in ¡°Israel¡¯s ceaseless assault on Gaza¡±, it adds.

The news comes just days after the rector of the University of St Andrews, who was removed from its governing body after accusing Israel of genocide,?was barred from attending graduation ceremonies because she has launched a legal action against the institution.

An Edinburgh spokeswoman said that freedom of expression was a ¡°fundamental principle¡± at the institution. ¡°However, should anyone act in a way that fosters a hostile environment or that makes others feel threatened ¨C as has unfortunately been the case here ¨C the university must take that seriously and deal with it in an appropriate and proportionate way,¡± she said.

The spokeswoman said that Edinburgh had offered support to those affected by conflict in the Middle East by offering sanctuary, scholarships, collaborative projects and community initiatives, and had followed its policies and procedures ¡°at all times¡±.

ºÚÁϳԹÏÍø

ADVERTISEMENT

¡°It is disappointing then that, rather than working together to do what we can to support those impacted by the violence, we have been met with ongoing and increasingly escalated disruption to our services, which impacts fellow students¡¯ studies and learning as well as our staff,¡± she said.

¡°While we see protests and other activism as very much part of the life of a university, we make a call for more respectful and appropriate engagement from those who have raised concerns, and we would welcome a positive dialogue about how we might come together to support those who have been affected by these issues.¡±

ºÚÁϳԹÏÍø

ADVERTISEMENT

patrick.jack@timeshighereducation.com

Register to continue

Why register?

  • Registration is free and only takes a moment
  • Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
  • Sign up for our newsletter
Register
Please Login or Register to read this article.

Related articles

Reader's comments (1)

The letter with the allegations against the university is somewhat disingenuous. The past year has been characterised by at least weekly (and sometimes daily) very noisy demonstrations not only in open campus spaces, but in teaching spaces which were 'occupied' by protestors, and repeated 'invasion' of the university library. Protestors cosplay by dressing up in the uniform of Hamas terrorists and shout about the 'global intifada' which they wish to bring to campus. Jewish students and staff have experienced harassment by these protestors - harassment being directed against persons identified as Jewish by the protestors and as non-aligned with their protest. The language is increasingly violent as is the imagery deployed. Far from their speech being suppressed, protestors have had virtually unobstructed access to shared spaces on campus and their protests are certainly very audible and widespread. By contrast, there have been no events or protests that amplify differing perspectives on the current war or the history of the relevant region. While all codes of conduct and freedom of expression policies champion the necessity of hearing positions and protests that some may find uncomfortable and disagreeable, the consistent pro-Palestinian protests of masked protestors shouting violent slogans contravene the code of conduct by harassing and intimidating other campus users, particularly Jewish students and staff whose protected characteristics are targeted directly and intentionally by the protestors. Quite aside, of course, from the fact that none of these protests do anything at all to alleviate the horrendous suffering of Palestinians in the current war or bring about rightful Palestinian national self-determination. That, after a year, the university is now insisting that staff and students follow the code of conduct or face disciplinary processes is a positive development to enable a range of views to be expressed on campus without harassment and intimidation. If the protestors were serious about upholding freedom of expression, they could see this university action as a positive move as it upholds the need for campus to be a safe space for the expression of views that contradict their own.

Sponsored

ADVERTISEMENT