ºÚÁϳԹÏÍø

Claudine Gay quits as Harvard University president

Premier institution loses first black leader after record short tenure amid persistent partisan pressure and evidence of her own scholarly failings

January 2, 2024
Claudine Gay
Source: Harvard University
Claudine Gay, president of Harvard University

Claudine Gay has resigned as president of Harvard University, ending the shortest leadership tenure of?the nation¡¯s oldest and most prestigious university, relenting to a?broad-based partisan attack on US?higher education combined with her own personal missteps en?route to?becoming the institution¡¯s first black leader.

¡°This is not a?decision I?came to?easily,¡± Professor Gay said in a?letter of?resignation nearly a?month after a?congressional hearing at?which she and two other presidents of?top US?universities were berated by?Republican lawmakers over their responses to pro-Palestinian demonstrations on their campuses.

¡°But, after consultation with members of the corporation,¡± , referring to Harvard¡¯s chief governing board, ¡°it has become clear that it is in the best interests of Harvard for me to resign so that our community can navigate this moment of extraordinary challenge with a focus on the institution rather than any?individual.¡±

The board, in response, said it accepted her decision ¡°with great sadness¡± and had chosen Harvard¡¯s provost, Alan Garber, to serve as interim president until a new leader for the institution is chosen and takes office.

ºÚÁϳԹÏÍø

ADVERTISEMENT

Professor Gay is the second of the three university leaders ¨C all female and relatively new in their presidencies ¨C to resign under sustained criticisms from politicians and institutional donors who have faulted US higher education over a range of policies, most effectively of late the Israel-Hamas conflict.

Elizabeth Magill resigned earlier as president of the University of Pennsylvania, while the third president at the congressional hearing, Sally Kornbluth of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, has received firm backing from her governing board.

ºÚÁϳԹÏÍø

ADVERTISEMENT

Harvard¡¯s board had also backed Professor Gay, but its commitment weakened as her conservative critics identified a series of instances of apparent plagiarism in her peer-reviewed journal articles and doctoral dissertation dating back to?1997.

Professor Gay is a daughter of Haitian immigrants and a social scientist who was chosen in December 2022 to serve as president and took office last July. She had served as Harvard¡¯s dean of arts and sciences since 2018. She was recruited to Harvard from Stanford University in 2006 to become a professor of government, having earned her bachelor¡¯s degree in economics from Stanford and her doctorate in government from Harvard.

From the moment of her selection, conservative critics suggested her as an unworthy choice driven by concern for racial equity over quality. Such complaints exploded after the October attack by Hamas militants against Israeli civilians, when an array of student groups expressed sympathy for Palestinians besieged by Israeli military forces.

At the December congressional hearing, Republican lawmakers repeatedly and aggressively accused the three university presidents of not doing enough to protect their Jewish students, and the presidents struggled in the heated atmosphere to explain the differences between legitimate political debate and illegal threats of violence.

ºÚÁϳԹÏÍø

ADVERTISEMENT

And shortly afterward, conservative critics began publicising repeated instances in?Professor Gay¡¯s scholarly work, running several sentences in length, where she appears to have copied the writings of others without attribution.

That left her and Harvard¡¯s governing board to weigh the severity of those offences and measure them against the cost to the institution and higher education more broadly of relenting to pressure from politicians and philanthropists seeking greater control over academic governance.

¡°These past several months¡±, Harvard¡¯s governing board said in its statement, ¡°have seen Harvard and higher education face a series of sustained and unprecedented challenges. In the face of escalating controversy and conflict, president Gay and the fellows have sought to be guided by the best interests of the institution, whose future progress and well-being we are together committed to?uphold.¡±

In her statement, Professor Gay bemoaned the loss of trust that the political divisions had brought to the university community. ¡°Amidst all of this,¡± she said, ¡°it?has been distressing to have doubt cast on my commitments to confronting hate and to upholding scholarly rigour ¨C two bedrock values that are fundamental to who I?am ¨C and frightening to be subjected to personal attacks and threats fuelled by racial animus.¡±

ºÚÁϳԹÏÍø

ADVERTISEMENT

A leader of the Republican campaign, Representative Elise Stefanik, cheered her departure, asserting in a? that ¡°this is just the beginning of what will be the greatest scandal of any college or university in history¡±.

paul.basken@timeshighereducation.com

Register to continue

Why register?

  • Registration is free and only takes a moment
  • Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
  • Sign up for our newsletter
Register
Please Login or Register to read this article.

Related articles

Reader's comments (9)

Nothing in the article about Gay's lack of commitment to freedom of expression on campus (a selective commitment is no commitment at all) or to her middling scholarly record (because race and EDI trumps excellence, I take it). And, of course, because Republicans called for her termination, the call was partisan and political, despite her clear incompetence and lack of commitment to academic values. Gay cannot even resign gracefully, alleging "racial animus" in her final sentence. Claudine Gay is not a hill THE should choose to die on.
To paraphrase Churchill, Harvard had an initial choice between a scandal and dishonor. It chose dishonor and now it will have scandal. Plagiarism cannot be defended as free speech.
Her Haitian parents are from the elite ruling class families in Haiti. She attended a prestigious/expensive high school before going to Stanford. Please do not imply that she was a poor immigrant child.
Pretty impressive the subtle spin you gave to this story. The problem is not with "conservative critics". The problem is with not lambasting "progressives" (or progressively-biased outlets...cough cough...) who, rather than focusing on the issues at stake, decided to pretend that this is about race, gender or whatever else you find aligned with the mainstream "priorities".
There is much to criticise about this affair. How could Harvard have appointed her in the first place? That's a good place to start. Her lamentable academic record and multiple instances of plagiarism are second and third. Then, there is her involvement in ruining the careers of fellow academics who questioned her simplistic ideas about racial equality. The best thing you can say about Gay is she resigned yet did that in bad grace, blaming everybody but herself for trashing the reputation of academia.
This is bad in so many respects for Harvard and academia in general. I would just add two points: given the specific situation and history of the country, coming from a wealthy family in Haiti is an indication of significant power and privilege in conditions of extreme poverty for the vast majority of the other citizens. Second, one of the issues with Gay was that she stated "At Harvard University, the seriousness of calling for the genocide of the Jews on campus, *depends on the context* ". Quite some re-interpretation by the author of this article, when he writes that what was happening in the university premises was "student groups expressing sympathy for Palestinians besieged by Israeli military forces"
Maybe when Trump wins he will have Kanye West be President of Harvard! Imagine the writer of this article then!
it's unfortunate to see the appalling comments on this article. Being from a wealthy Haitian family is still a step away from being a billionaire alumni who can exercise so much influence over whether she can keep her position or not.
To expatacademic: The comments on this article are directed at the article itself, at Paul Basken's tendentious interpretation of the Gay affair. Readers noted that Gay is from a wealthy Haitian family not to disparage Gay, but to counter Basken's implicit suggestion that she was a poor immigrant. Recognizing that Gay was unfit to be a university president (her lackluster academic accomplishments; her disdain for academic values, as evinced, for instance, in her role in Roland Fryer's suspension) does not imply support for the means used to get rid of her. Your point about the influence of billionaire alumni is well taken and needs to be discussed critically. But it is not relevant to the comments you mischaracterize as "appalling."

Sponsored

ADVERTISEMENT